A sharp debate has erupted within Ijesaland over allegations of the desecration of the Owa Obokun throne.
In a strongly worded article, Omo Bewaji Ofokutu criticized Yinka Fasuyi for what he described as an attempt to appease the public following the controversial events surrounding the revered throne.
Ofokutu likened Fasuyi’s approach to Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement policy during World War II, describing it as a “soporific plea” aimed at encouraging the people of Ijesaland to accept the destruction of their sacred institution. He accused Fasuyi of collusion in what he termed a premeditated obliteration of the throne, stating that such actions insult the pride and heritage of the Ijesa people.
The author called on Ijesa descendants to reject any counsel that advocates acquiescence, drawing parallels with the bravery of historical figures like Ogedengbe and Arimoro, who resisted domination during the 19th-century Ibadan wars. Ofokutu urged the community to emulate the courage of their ancestors, warning that acceptance of the alleged affront would tarnish their legacy.
“It is difficult to see how any self-respecting Ijesa son or daughter can accept this gross violation of the throne of Owa,” Ofokutu wrote. He dismissed Fasuyi’s message as “snake oil” and implored him to cease his appeals.
The controversy has sparked intense discussions within Ijesaland, as residents reflect on the implications of the alleged throne hijack and the broader significance of preserving their cultural and historical values.
