ABUJA (Sundiata Post) – The former National Security Adviser (NSA), Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), has denied ever making statement implicating anyone or group in the allegation of $2.1 billion arms purchase deal brought against him by the Federal Government.
Dasuki, who spoke through his lawyer, Mr. Ahmed Raji (SAN), on Thursday in Abuja, said he never made such a statement or named anyone to EFCC and wondered where the authors got their information from.
“I was with Dasuki yesterday (Wednesday) and wish to make categorical statement that my client never made any statement of such nature or naming anybody or group in any statement.
“Quote me anywhere, Dasuki has not done anything like that. It is absolutely untrue. It is the figment of the imagination of the authors aimed at creating falsehood for reasons best known to them and Nigerians should disregard them.
“They are just out to scandalise the man, bring his image and character into disrepute so that his friends and well wishers can run away from him. They want him deserted and that will fail”, Raji said.
Meanwhile, the government has at the resumed hearing in court, appointed a private legal practitioner, Mr. Oladipupo Okpeseyitan (SAN), to prosecute Dasuki on its behalf.
Okpeseyitan, after announcing his appearance, told the trial judge, Justice Adeniyi Ademola that he had filed a motion for stay of execution of the ruling of the court which granted Dasuki permission to seek medical treatment.
He applied to the court to put the ruling on hold pending the outcome of the appeal in the matter.
Raji in his reply told the court that he had just been served with the motion in court, adding that he needed time to respond to the motion.
[pro_ad_display_adzone id=”70560″]
The case has been fixed for December 8 for hearing.
Also, PRNigeria has in its release, said that not all funds in the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) are related to arm procurement as was being alleged.
According to the findings, ONSA manages several funds for national security and other special interventions which are not related to Boko Haram or arms procurement.
“They include recurrent expenditures and miscellaneous expenses under Special Service Office (SSO) to fund special projects and programmes including capacity building, refreshment, travelling, office maintenance, crisis communication and support to special causes and non-governmental organisations.
“Most of the figures being bandied were taken from the special funds meant for the purposes that they were spent and not on the so-called arms deal.
“All over the world, there are lots of expenditures of national security and sensitive matters that are not ridiculed in the press,” it explained.