Home Business Ex-Barclays Bank chiefs face grilling by fraud office

Ex-Barclays Bank chiefs face grilling by fraud office

By Caroline Binham and Patrick Jenkins in LondonDiamond to be questioned over Qatar

Bob Diamond, John Varley and other senior members of Barclays’ former management are to be questioned under caution by the UK’s Serious Fraud Office, in an acceleration of its probe into alleged corrupt arrangements in Qatar as part of the bank’s emergency cash call in 2008.

For Barclays, which last week launched a restructuring plan to boost struggling profitability, the news is an unwelcome reminder of the legacy issues that still hang over it. “They’ve just sliced off two arms and a leg, and still someone’s out to get them,” said one person involved.

A dozen individuals have now been either interviewed under caution or called for interview by the SFO, according to people familiar with the probe. Aside from Mr Diamond and Mr Varley, both former Barclays chiefs, they include Roger Jenkins, former head of the bank’s tax advisory business, and Chris Lucas, former finance director.

An interview under caution suggests the SFO believes it may have reasonable grounds to suspect that the individual has committed an offence. Such interviews are preceded by the warning: “You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court.”
Such questioning does not require arrest and can instead be scheduled by appointment, as is the case with the Barclays probe. Mr Jenkins had his interview before Easter, Mr Lucas’s is expected to take place over the next few weeks, while no date has been set for any interviews of Mr Varley or Mr Diamond, people familiar with the probe told the Financial Times. No charging decision will be reached until the interviews have been conducted.

For the bank, the ultimate risk of the SFO’s investigation is a corporate prosecution under the UK’s antiquated corruption laws, which have since been overhauled by the 2011 Bribery Act. Under the old laws, the SFO must prove that a so-called “directing mind” of a company knew of, and ordered, bribes.

The UK financial regulator has already said it wants to impose a £50m fine, which Barclays is contesting, for failing to disclose £322m in fees paid to Qatari investors. This brings the total of disclosed fees and commissions paid to investors in the Gulf state in 2008 to £450m, more than 7 per cent of the capital invested.

The SFO, Barclays and Mr Jenkins declined to comment. Lawyers for Mr Lucas and Mr Varley declined to comment. A lawyer for Qatar Holding did not respond to a request seeking comment. A spokesman for Mr Diamond said: “Mr Diamond will continue to assist wherever he can on anything related to Barclays but he is unable to comment on any specific inquiry.” Mr Diamond denies any wrongdoing. (FT)

Previous articleFears grow that Ukraine’s regional self-rule polls could herald break-up
Next articleCameron warns against closing door to Pfizer’s AstraZeneca bid

Leave a Reply