Press to cover Britain’s royal baby from a distance

Whatsapp News


When William and wife Kate emerge from hospital cradling Britain’ royal baby for the cameras, the picture will be on the front of newspapers worldwide. But don’t expect many photographs after .
The second in line to the throne and wife have fought hard for the right to bring up their in private, despite being of the most famous couples in the world.
Their first child, George, is approaching second birthday but has only appeared in public a few times — outside the hospital when he was born in 2013, at christening and on a tour of Australia and Zealand last year.
The are generally prepared to accept such scarce appearances by George and the baby, expected this month.
“People have quite an outdated view of the British royal press pack,” said Richard Palmer, royal correspondent for Britain’ Daily Express newspaper.

think they still think we’re hiding in hedgerows and doing things people did 25 years ago.
“But the reality is the British press is pretty respectful to the royal at the moment — some might say a bit cowed.”
“Readers don’t want you to go too far,” added Simon Perry, chief foreign correspondent of US celebrity magazine People.
don’t think there is an appetite for people to be pursued or intruded upon in an excessive way.”
– William ‘blames press’ over Diana –
The death of William’s mother Diana, Princess of Wales, was a turning point in the royal ’s the .
She was being followed by paparazzi photographers when her car, driven by a chauffeur who had been drinking, crashed in Paris in 1997.
William “thinks the press were to blame” for Diana’s death, said Judy Wade, Hello! magazine’s royal correspondent.
Kate is also suspicious of the after incidents including the publication by a magazine of paparazzi photographs of her topless on holiday in 2012, Wade added.
Although Britain has no overarching privacy law, newspapers now hardly ever publish paparazzi photographs of William, Kate or George, even though they are periodically published by magazines elsewhere and circulate on Twitter and Facebook.
Palmer said newspapers are very conscious of how their readers will view stories about them, asking: “Are the readers going to think: ‘Oh my god, they’re doing the same thing to this couple as they did to Diana’?”
[pro_ad_display_adzone id=”10″]
Royal officials also take a hard line — when a photographer was suspected of following George and his nanny in London parks last year, lawyers swiftly sent a warning letter.
But Wade said paparazzi shots were still published elsewhere in the world.
“If somebody gets a set of paparazzi pictures, they will sell in Europe, America but not here,” Wade said. “A lot of people, especially photographers, can’t any money out of any more.”
– Phone-hacking scandal –
Another factor in changing the style of coverage has been the outcry over British newspapers hacking the voicemails of celebrities, which led to some reporters being jailed.
The News of the World tabloid, closed by owner Rupert Murdoch in 2011, hacked phones belonging to Kate, William and his brother Prince Harry over 200 times.
This led to stories including revealing that William’s nickname for his wife was “babykins”.
looks like most coverage of the second royal baby will be much like that for the first — respectful, even deferential, a focus on the feelgood factor.
But Palmer warned that, despite William and Kate’s desire for privacy, the royals in general need media coverage to guarantee their survival.
“Clearly without the oxygen of publicity, the royal family would wither and die,” he said.

you may also like:

Election is over and Jonathan conceded! Stop the lies, insults – Okupe tells APC