Ethiopia passes law imposing jail terms for internet posts that stir unrest

Whatsapp News


Addis Ababa – Ethiopia’ parliament on Thursday passed a law imposing jail terms for whose internet posts stir unrest.

According Lawmaker Abebe Godebo, a move the government says is needed prevent ahead of elections but which the United Nations says will stifle free speech.

Godebo said Ethiopia, one of the most tightly controlled states in , has undergone huge change since reformist Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed took office two years ago.

The parliament even added that Abiy has freed and and lifted a ban on opposition parties, the authorities have struggled contain a surge in ethnic .

An election this year is seen as the biggest test yet of whether his ambitious reforms can stick.

The law permits fines of up 100,000 Ethiopian birr (3,000 dollars) and imprisonment for up five years for anyone who shares or creates social media posts that are deemed result in or disturbance of public order.

Some 297 lawmakers who were present in the chamber voted in favour of the bill while just 23 were opposed.

“Ethiopia has become a victim of disinformation, the country is a land of diversity and this bill will help to balance those diversities,’’ Godebo noted.

Several of the lawmakers who opposed the bill said violates a constitutional guarantee of free speech.

Abiy, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2019 for his reconciliation with Ethiopia’ neighbour and longtime foe Eritrea, has pledged that this year’ election will be free and fair.

The nation of 108 million has regularly held elections since 1995, but only one, in 2005, was competitive.

The law was first endorsed by Abiy’ cabinet in November.

At the , the ’s rapporteur on freedom of expression urged authorities to reconsider , warning would worsen already high ethnic tensions and possibly fuel further violence.

International rights groups say creates a legal means for the government to muzzle opponents.

Amnesty International’s Ethiopia researcher Fisseha Tekle said politicians, activists, and others will be forced to be cautious.

“They will be afraid that their speech might fall into the definition of hate speech or can be considered as false information,” Tekle noted.